香港三级片

That鈥檚 the name of the my daughter and other Lafayette High School seniors earned. It was senior awards night in the high school gymnasium, and students finishing their K-12 education were being honored for various accomplishments.

My thoughts turned to Ken Jacob. This is an occupational hazard that often annoys my wife. We鈥檒l be at an event and my attention will seem to shift elsewhere, with my face glazed over as I ponder an idea that popped into my head. She鈥檒l poke me and ask: 鈥淵ou鈥檙e writing a column, aren鈥檛 you?鈥�

So it often is. Back to Ken Jacob.

In 1986, he was a Democratic state representative from Columbia, home of the University of Missouri. University leaders were worried about a trend: many of the highest-performing high school students in Missouri were heading out of state for college.

The 鈥淏right Flight鈥� scholarship was created to counter that trend. At its inception, it awarded up to $2,000 to the top 3% of Missouri graduating seniors, based on ACT or SAT scores.

When Jacob鈥檚 bill was passed, and signed by Gov. John Ashcroft, a Republican, it had an immediate impact. In 1985, the year before the bill was passed, about two-thirds of the state鈥檚 highest-performing students left Missouri for college. In 1987, the first year the Bright Flight scholarships were awarded, 62% of those students chose to stay in the state.

But back then, tuition at any of the in-state public schools in Missouri . The scholarship covered the full cost of tuition. In the nearly four decades since, state support for higher education in Missouri, as a percentage of the overall state budget, has gone down. And tuition has gone sky high.

In 1990, for instance, just four years after the Bright Flight bill was passed, the University of Missouri-Columbia received 70% of its funding from the state. The student share of revenue, measured by tuition, was 27%. In the decades since, those numbers have flipped. In 2022, tuition made up 62% of the university鈥檚 revenue; state funding was only 30%.

This isn鈥檛 just a Missouri problem. Nationally, the 鈥渟tudent share鈥� of the cost of higher education doubled from 20% to 40% between 1980 and 2023. Unfortunately, Missouri鈥檚 historically poor per-capita support for higher education 鈥� between , depending on who鈥檚 doing the counting 鈥� makes the problem worse than in other states.

What that means in practice is that all of Missouri鈥檚 scholarship programs, those for academics and those for financial need, don鈥檛 produce nearly as much bang for the buck as they used to. Bright Flight, Access Missouri and the A+ program all suffer from underfunding, meaning the promises made when the Missouri Legislature created those programs are no longer fulfilled.

A year ago, Fred Hall, a former curator at Mizzou, called me to lament the situation.

鈥淕overnment should be the great equalizer by giving those with fewer resources equal opportunity,鈥� Hall said. 鈥淚nstead, low funding with higher tuition means a denial to those who currently have dreams but no means.鈥�

Every year, the Republicans who control the General Assembly seem to celebrate minor bumps in higher education funding while also talking about further diminishing the state鈥檚 tax base, so that there will never be an opportunity to reverse Missouri鈥檚 race to the bottom.

A Bright Flight scholarship that once covered full tuition at a state university now offers up to $1,000 for students like my daughter, which is less than 10% of the yearly tuition at a state institution. Mizzou now costs more than $14,000 a year for a full-time student (not including housing expenses) 鈥� while the state鈥檚 scholarship program is stuck in 1986.

It鈥檚 no wonder that student debt in the past two decades has more than doubled, with parents and students owing because loans are the only way many people can fund higher education.

As I sat in the gymnasium applauding the accomplishments of my daughter and her friends, many of whom will attend college out of state, I took a break from the parental pride to lament Missouri鈥檚 new reality. Bright Flight has become just two words on a screen rather than a promise made from one generation to the next.